By Jeremiah Cahill

Our nation’s self-proclaimed “War Secretary,” Pete Hegseth has spotted the enemy, and the peril we face comes from—the Boy Scouts! A recently leaked Pentagon memo reveals Hegseth’s intention to cut off decades-old support for what is now known as Scouting America.
Language in the memo—not yet official policy—criticizes Scouting for having become “genderless,” and echoes Hegseth’s earlier attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion. The proposal calls for the Pentagon to quit providing support to the National Jamboree, a gathering of thousands of Scouts held every four years. It proposes a ban on any Scout meetings at military installations. (But apparently Congress requires the Pentagon to support the Jamboree.) Preparations are currently underway for the 10-day event in summer 2026 hosting as many as 20,000 Scouts.
Hegseth’s proposals to dismantle the military/scouting relationship have already been widely criticized—and they run counter to one of my earliest impressions of Scouting.
I grew up in Honolulu, Hawaii, joining Cub Scouts and then moving on to the local Boy Scout troop at about age 11. Not long after that, there was a large gathering to provide Island scouts with an event similar to the National Jamboree. This was the Makahiki, a name chosen to echo a traditional Hawaiian festival. In the pre-contact Hawaiian kingdom, Makahiki marked the beginning of a new year, and was a time of celebration and rejuvenation. Warfare was prohibited, allowing for peace and tranquility.
The one Makahiki I attended was held at a site not commonly used by Scouts—the iconic (and extinct) volcanic crater, popularly known as Diamond Head, on the eastern edge of Waikiki Beach. Early in the 20th century, the crater became a key part of the U.S. Army’s coastal defense system, replete with bunkers, artillery batteries, tunnels and a command center.
At the event in the 1950s, we must have numbered easily 500 or more boys, spending a weekend camping in tents and doing what Scouts do—crafts, games, and various skill-building challenges. It was a big logistical effort, supported by the U.S. Army—trucks, equipment, chow lines, and a medical station. All highly impressive, compared to our small weekly troop meetings.
On arrival, we were instructed to take off our shirts, get in a very long line, and undergo a cursory physical exam. This procedure was unexpected, and I was mildly uncomfortable. Suddenly, I felt alone (where were my troop mates?) There I was, a skinny, self-conscious white boy amid a sea of diversity.
The exam would be brief—Army doctors with stethoscopes would listen to heart and lungs, ask a question or two, then move us along. Still, I remember my discomfort as the line inched forward.
One Army officer, likely a doctor himself, was standing to the side monitoring the line as we approached. I’m not sure what caused him to notice me—perhaps he sensed my unease. But as I got closer he spoke to me quietly, directly: “You’ve got good stomach muscles, son.”
Huh? Me? I’m sure I mustered a weak smile and a thank you. Then it was on to the stethoscope and the following three days of activities, of which I remember little. What has always stood out is that a competent and kind professional took an interest and informed me that, hey, I actually had well-toned abdominal muscles!
I went ahead with the activities—building rope bridges, stumbling along in a three-legged race, or hustling to build a fire and boil water—with just a bit more confidence than I might have had previously. It was a small gesture from that Army doctor, but it had an outsized and lasting impact on me.
That experience, and Scouting in general, has helped guide me through a lifetime of physical fitness, preparedness, and values endemic to Scouting. One of those values, which in those early years we seemed to absorb almost unconsciously, was acceptance of diversity.
My Scout troop, like so much else in the Islands, comprised a wide range of races and ethnicities. We were pals in the neighborhood, school,s and Scouting—Japanese, Chinese, Hawaiian, Portuguese, Caucasian (known locally as haole), and plenty of racial mixtures. It was simply how life was during my early years in Honolulu.
More recently, Scouting America has expanded female participation. Currently, nearly 1,000 young women have earned the Eagle Scout rank, Scouting’s highest achievement. Welcoming girls is part of a broad, multi-year effort toward greater inclusivity, with the organization now accepting LGBTQ+ members and recruiting families from all backgrounds and ethnicities.
Military support for scouting—an association that goes back more than 100 years—has obvious benefits for the armed services. It’s an opportunity for future recruitment, getting the attention of patriotic, civic-minded youngsters.
But Scouts take different paths. I went on to become a civil rights activist, anti-war protester, and, eventually, a Quaker. Regardless of any particular direction, I’ve seen the impact Scouting has made in the lives of my peers and others around me.
And while I now decry the vast U.S. military budget—approaching $1 trillion per year—I think back to what seems a more worthwhile spending priority—logistical support for Scouting activities. How about just a tiny sliver of that budget to encourage future leaders?
Secretary Hegseth sees Scouting America as not representing the “warrior culture” he seeks to promote. But consider the Scout Oath, conceived in 1908, in which a Scout promises to “…help other people at all times; keep myself physically strong, mentally alert, and morally straight.” In a perilous world, that seems like timely guidance not just for young Scouts, but all the way up the chain of command.
©2026 Jeremiah Cahill
Jeremiah lives and writes in Madison, Wisconsin, endeavoring to keep himself mentally alert during challenging times.















